| ?
Wrote: I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO FIND REFERENCE TO HORSES (WITH DIFFERENT COLORS) AND THE MEANING OF OF THE VERSES FOR THE DIFFERENT COLORS ALONG WITH THE DIFFERENT VERSES.REVELATIONS I HAVE A SPANISH FRIEND THAT TELLS ME THAT THE REFERENCE TO "A PALE HORSE" IS DIFFERENT IN SPANISH ,REVELATIONS THAN IN THE ENGLISH VERSION. DO YOU KNOW WHERE I CAN FIND INTEPERATION OF THE VERSES OF THE DIFFERENT COLOR HORSES, AND THEIR MEANINGS? Don Wrote: If you will go to our study of the Book of Revelation (Click on our REVELATIONS button on our home page--the one with the golden scales), and then click on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd sets of our study, you will find some information about the four horses of the Apocalypse. REVELATIONSREVELATIONS You can also click on our Treasure Chest of Bible Study Aids on our home page and choose the Blue Letter Bible.REVELATIONS If you search for the word "horse" you can view the sources they've included on their site by selecting a source in the window beside the "Choose Entry Then Click Here" link. REVELATIONSREVELATIONSREVELATIONS I'm not proficient with the Spanish language, so I can't respond to your friends comment. Hope this helps you, Don |
REVELATIONSTO OUR VISITORS:
We have received a pertinent WRAP that typifies the
disconcertment of many young people of the last two or so generations. This person has
asked that we not put his WRAP up on the web, so we will honor that. However, because the
confusion and bewilderment stemming from what he has been taught in our societywe
have chosen to put our comments to his WRAP up on our site. The following sentences taken
from his WRAP presents the dilemma of so many today, and we will respond to it.
B'Ann Wrote: Basically, we are looking at Biblical covenants and laws of nature when we discuss this situation. The Bible says that God told His people to be "fruitful and multiply." God gave this as a commandment and a promise at the same time. I suppose what we really have here is a decision. People have to decide if the Bible is true or not and whether one wants to accept these Scriptures. The Judeo-Christian community has long accepted these as a part of God and the creation account.
The Creation Account has been "under fire", so to speak, ever since the Darwin Theory and the resulting "big bang" theory, etc. Here we see a type of non-scientific data. The Darwin Theory is just that, a theory, with no scientific data to prove or disprove it, which has been put forth as a formula. The base they use for the numerical numbering of the ages are built upon base ten of standard math. However it produced the following article from the encyclopedia.
So it would appear that Gods account is certainly as good as the "gas" account fostered by Darwinites. We do not have a numerical accounting for the past ages for this reason. God chose not to give man a precise number of years from which to count time, but there is a Scripture that has been acceptable throughout the span of Biblical teaching. If evolution supporters had decided to make the base system a twelve, binary, sixteen, eight, or any other base, the formula would have given certain periods/ages with an assigned number. In other words, a person can come up with different numbers for the ages depending upon which base is used. These do not necessarily reflect a true numerical age because we do not know for sure.The Christain belief, however, has always dealt with the number 7, 12, 1000, 44,4,3,77 and any of these could be substituted into Darwin Theory/formula to produce a given number of years for the Paleozoic Era, Mesozoic Era and Cenozoic Era.
Now we move once again to theory versus belief. A theory is a formula put forth that serves as a base from which an ideology can be formed. A Christian belief has to have faith as its substance. The writer of Hebrews addressed this in a long discourse of which I will put forth a few verses:
I have said all this to say that the Scriptures teach the Creation Account, they teach the marriage concept of Adam and Eve, and they do teach the birthing of children by the way of the womb.
We as Christians, have to remain steadfast and unmovable in our hearts, but this has nothing to do with condoning or condemnation. There is a constant circle of humanity around us each day, with their own beliefs and habits. The whole idea of Christianity is a matter of choice. In fact, God set it up having "choice" as the starting point. After we choose to become a believer in Christ, we are certainly not to condemn.
I think that this is the dilemma that you are feeling. You do not want to judge but rather to have a right spirit toward man. By the way, Im glad you gave up on "religion". We are supposed to be "born-again" Christians. There is a world of difference in the two. Religion brings rules and self-righteousness, and a looking down our noses at those that are not as perfect as us. Christians are moved with compassion. Sympathy will not suffice, neither will empathy nor pity. The Scriptures say this of compassion:
It is this "compassion of Christ" that we are to have toward our fellowman. I have a "shelf" in my home and I have learned to put many things upon it, things that are not visible to the world, but God sees when I put them there. I just simply tell Him that I cannot make a decision about this matter and that He will have to bring this about in me. In this manner, I do not "pop off my opinion" about something in a condescending manner. This will only alienate the person who is the source of concern.
It all comes down to the choice a person makes. Is the Creation Account to be believed or trashed as archaic. If it is to be believed, and this can only be done through the gift and fruit of faith, then a person would naturally have one sexual orientation. If it is to be trashed as old and out of date, then the mating pattern of the lower animals will become prevalent in mankind as well. What we see is a moving away from the teachings of the Bible. Again, it is up to each person to accept or reject the teachings contained in Gods Word.
It is the believers job to witness. The Great Commission holds true for every person that names the name of Christ. Ideally, we should witness to individuals while they are still young and tender towards the good things of life. For this reason, the Sunday school bus ministry is still the most vital/effective of all the ways a church might use its funds. The little child must be given the opportunity to hear the Word of God. Herein lies a great problem! Too many of our people have never heard the Scriptures and do not know that they have a choice. Does nature bless the homosexual sexual orientation? I will let you answer this for yourself. When people try to use the things of nature in an unnatural way, Mother Nature can be very unbending and unforgiving. In the natural, we cannot breathe under water, we cannot live in outer space, two women cannot birth a child, neither can two men. I will stop here with these Scriptures that were brought forward into the New Testament from the Old Testament Teachings. They have to be considered as one makes a decision about the lifestyle they chose, condone, or condemn.
Summation: Freedom of choice is the key word here. God allows mankind to have just that when He told the Believers of old.
This has by no means been a complete treatment of the issues of homosexuality and the individual/society; but, hopefully, it will give you enough Scriptures to get started on your own research. BAnn Love |
|
|
| REVELATIONS Question-Comment: Dear Rev. Love: Greetings in the Name of our Lord Jesus!I just found your sight and it is very nice. I do have a question, on your chart, the age of conscience you state that conscience replaced mans dead spirit. I know man, at the fall became dead in "trepasses and sins". Can you elaborate on you statement. I look forward to corresponding with you. May God Bless You!!!! --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DON & B'ANN WROTE:
These are two well-known Scriptures that depict a "whole man"; but we are told of much that happened between the times wherein these Scriptures apply. The first major event that effect the makeup of man took place in the Garden of Eden during the first age of man, the Age of Innocence. In fact, this event brought the Age of Innocence to a close and set to ticking the time allotted to fallen man.
In this passage we see the first handiwork of the master of lies and deception. Since the time of his testing and subsequent failure, Luciferthe fallen angel who is better known as Satan or the devilis confined to his chore of testing the hearts of men and women. To do this he often quotes enough of Gods word to disarm his victims, and then he twists those words to accomplish his purposes. In this particular instance we read: "And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil" (Gen. 3: 4). To the natural eye, it looks like Lucifer was telling the truth. For the day that Adam and Eve ate of the fruit of the forbidden tree, to all appearances, they seemed not to have died. (It was more than 900 years later that Adam died.) And sure enough, they did become aware of good and evil. But the whole truth is that Adam [and Eve] did die spiritually that day and that they passed that spiritual death on down to all of their posterity. Also, not only were they made to be aware of good and evil, but they understood that they would pass the consequences of the evil that they had committed to their children and their childrens children, etc. The Apostle Paul wrote of the consequences of the first couples disobedience in his epistles to the Roman church.
Then in his epistles to the Ephesians and the Colossians, Paul made it plain that Adams transgression had brought about a spiritual death; for he spoke of them being dead even though their bodies were yet alive.
We know that Jesus came to the earth to undo the works of the devil, and a crucial part of His work was to undo the death of the spirit of man brought about by Adam. REVELATIONS REVELATIONS
So, now we have it, the spirit of man died in the Garden and that death has passed on down to all of mankind; but for those who receive Christ as Lord and Savior, the spirit is alive, being born anew. But just a minute! If the spirit of the natural/unregenerated man is dead as we normally think of something being dead, what about these verses?
Before we go any further, we need to consider this triune nature of man: i.e., his body, his soul, and his spirit. Briefly, the purpose of the body is to have world consciousness: i.e., via his senses man is able to be aware of his surroundings. The purpose of the soul is to have self-consciousness. In mans soul are his volition, his reasoning, his emotions, and those things that make up his personality. But the purpose for mans spirit is not that simple. Apparently, the purpose for his spirit was originally two-fold. That is, it was for "God consciousness" and it was the "spark of life" that made man a living soul. (Granted, from this point on we are delving into the mysterious of God, for only God can give and sustain life. Consequently, we are left to speculation. If God were to bother to tell us all about the spirit in our temple of clay, we probably wouldnt be able to comprehend. More than likely wed find ourselves in the arena of questions like: "Where did God come from? How can it be that Hes always been? How can He be boundlessbeing able to go in any direction forever with no one or nothing to contain Him? and all other such questions that can only be answered by faith [cf. Heb. 11:3]. ) If the spirit of man was originally for "God consciousness" and the "spark of life," then the death of man in the Garden was the withdrawal of the presence of the Spirit of God from the spirit of man. This makes sense when we consider that Jesus said "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me" (John 14:6). Since God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are three-in-one, when the Spirit of God removed Himself from man, man no longer had any spiritual life in himself. However, there is an abundance of Scriptures which seem to support the stance that the spirit of man (i.e. the spark of life from God) is still functioning in man. But we should note that this spirit is not mans to keep. We read in the book of Ecclesiastes the lot of those who die apart from the salvation in Christ Jesus. REVELATIONS
However, for those who die in Christ, whose spirits have been born again and have become one with Christ, to be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord. Not only will the believers spirit return to Christbut the believer goes with it. Hopefully, this will shed some light on the spirit of man. Also in your WRAP AROUND, you wonder on what authority I contend that the conscience was placed in man the day that mans spirit died in Adam (and Eve). Good Question! The wife and I have done a study on the three parts of the triune man; and in my mind I had included that study in our book THE CLOCK OF THE AGES. However, I cannot find it on our site; so, apparently, I had used the study in one of our radio programs instead. The Church of today calls the period after the fall of man from the Garden of Eden the Age of Conscience. This being because man entered into a new age wherein he could not make all decisions by the indwelling Spirit as they were able in the Garden, but by the conscious knowledge of good and evil. There are several Scriptures that deal with the conscience in man. Heres a couple of them. If youd like to check out all of them, go to either the Blue Letter Bible or the Bible Gateway buttons in our Bible Study Treasure Chest and search for the word "conscience."
If you go very far into our site, you will find that I try to always alert our visitors when I am inserting an inference/speculation. I goofed up on this one, thinking that I had commented on it elsewhere. In short, my conclusion is a speculation for I can find no Scripture that explains when man was given a conscience. Others have speculated that man was originally created with a conscience that went bad at the time of the fall. I dont buy this because in his state of innocence, man had no need of a conscience. But in truth, it doesnt matter when man got his conscience. Hes got it and it works in conjunction with the law to bring us to Christif well let it. Your astute observation underscores the reason that weve named our site "doweknow." When man puts his mind to the things of Godeven when his understanding is quickenedhis finite mind stands in wonder and amazed. How can it be that God did not have a beginning? Why does He never grow tired? For man, there is no answer to these kinds of questions but FAITH. To us, the particulars of the spirit of man fall in this category. For this reason we are determined not to get caught up in arguments over whose speculation is the best. Wed rather spend our time and substance promoting an absolute such as: God loves with the love of the cross every individual that has known or ever will know life. To us, the only thing that gives this life any reason, purpose, or hope is the cross of Calvary; for there we see the love and the intent of God. The Bible says that God send His Only Begotten Son to die for the sin of the world so that "whosoever" will believe in that atoning death and receive this One who rose from the dead as Lord and Savior will be given the gift of eternal life. It is also our determination to witness to others that when we receive this Christ Jesus as our Lord and Savior, that He sent His Holy Spirit to be a witness to us and to help us to witness to others. Thanks for taking time to WRAP with us and giving us opportunity to share with our other visitors as well. Yours in Christ, Don & BAnn Love |
|
| WANDA WROTE:DEAR
CHRISTIAN FRIEND
CAN YOU TELL ME WHERE I CAN FIND THE ABC'S & THE NUMBER'S WRITTEN IN HEBREW LANGUAGE? IN HIS NAME W BLACK P.S. I REALLY DO NEED A LOT MORE INFORMATION ON THE CREATION & ABOUT NOAH & THE ARK & THE FLOOD, SOMETHING THAT MIGHT EVEN HAVE QUESTIONS WITH IT FOR MY CLASS AGES 6-9. BAnn Wrote: The best place to look for the Hebrew alphabet/numbers would be the public library, ask a priest at a synagogue, or on the web. At this time I cannot give specifics because the need for this has not arisen within our ministry. I do know that we can thank the Hebrews for their Old Testament time line. After all, the Scriptures do say that the Hebrew time line was so accurate that they knew the time of the birth of the Christ child was approaching.REVELATIONS
As to the Creation account and Noahs Ark, the Bible account is the very best to use when teaching about this time in the Bible. I personally feel that at the time of Noah, the world was so highly developed that cloning was the norm and that only Noahs family practiced natural birthing of children.
(Remember, those who lived before the flood experienced longevity, living hundreds of years; and more than likely they were able to reason with a higher percentage of their intellect than wethe effect of the curse having less effect on them than us who are limited to an average of 70 years and who can only use a very small percentage of our brains.) We have been taught to envision a rustic ark put together with crude tools with all the animals marching into it two-by-two. True, the ark was rustic, but this was only because God had commanded it to be so. The making and loading of the ark took roughly 100 years, but, probably, it took little of that time to actually build the ark. In my opinion, the most of that time was spent in "loading" the ark. I am not sure the dimensions of the Ark was large enough to encompass the enormous zoo that would be needed. I think of the zoo I visit at Tampa, Florida, and I find this unlikely. To me, Noah only took enough full-grown animals aboard to take care of their sacrificial and eating needs. For the rest of the animals, I firmly believe that Noah spend a great deal of time gathering DNA, eggs and sperm, and storing them cryogenically (or he may have used a more highly advanced system). Jesus compared the culmination of our age with "as in the days of Noah." To me, man has not yet approached the time comparable to Noah, though he might do so rather quickly if he were to become "as one" in his scientific endeavorsremember, it took but a decade to get to the moon when only one nation united its resources and efforts for the task.
If my speculation about how it was before the flood is correct, then by simple deduction we can get a fairly accurate glimpse of where we are on the prophetic time line by looking at the "artificial" life and crossing of DNA through genetics. REVELATIONS For example, this past week on the news, we heard that the DNA of a spiders web was meshed with the DNA of a sheep to make a thread so strong that our own U.S. army has purchased all the flocks to make bullet proof vests. The Bible does not say anything about the things man was accomplishing before the flood; but in my opinion, whatever was going on at the time of Noah was so horrendous that God buried it under tons of water. Among the horrendous things, I suspect, was the ability to clone human beings without the spirit that God had given man. If we can already genetically cross spider web DNA with sheeps wool DNA for a super thread; then, the animal life before the flood was probably an unbelievable conglomerate. I feel that unless the "Son of Man" comes within the next few years, we are going to have unbelievable knowledge about how to alter the species on earth. (Please note from Matt. 24:26 that only the Father knows when this time will be. Jesus did not even know.) Why has no one ever presented this type teaching about life before/on the Ark? Just because no one has, DOWEKNOW that it wasnt so? We have only become aware of genetic mapping on a large scale the last few years. So, if the end of our age is to be "as in the days of Noah," then can we not look at our Lords prophecy in reverse and surmise that if we are doing these things, then so were theyand probably things even more astounding! Why the crude boat called the Ark? If travel was streamlined and sophisticated, the Ark would set there undesired and unmolested in a state-of-the-art world. Indeed, the Bible does say that the people made fun of it. Evidently, it was ugly. With my "taught" mindset, I had often wondered how they could have endured the unhygienic conditions on the ark with all those animals penned up in the big boat. Cryogenics makes sense. Do you teach this to your students? I think we have to consider this as a possibility. Why should going to church be thought of as sitting in a moth-eaten building with dirty, stained glass windows? Why cant going to church be interesting and fun? Why cant the Bible be taught as the current, informative, exciting book that it is? Why should it be presented as an old, dull book in a boring manner. Our children live in a high-tech world and science fiction fascinates them. I contend that the Bible makes science fiction old fashioned. In fact, if youll notice, most good science fiction stories borrow their ideas from the Bible. These are only my thoughts; and keep in mind that God chose not to talk about the mess the world was in before the flood. In the same vein, I have often wondered why it was during the mid-1800s before we started finding dinosaur bones . In the study of the history about the first dinosaur skeletons, we find that the church had people put into prison who claimed to have found these giant bones. When the bones started cropping up all over the world, then the church community had to relent and admit that they did exist. We do not need to be "fossils" within the Christian community, but always be open to revelations from Gods word. Indeed, all of a sudden, we are massing knowledge upon knowledge and it is fast becoming as when they built the Tower of Babylon to by-pass Gods plan. Anyway, the Bible does say this about man even at that long ago date.
Maybe this will give you some ideas to spice up your teaching. To me it is unfortunate that our young people are too often taught that Jesus is a stern task master Who requires things of us that we cant do, and stands ready to "whip up on us" when we fail. Why should He be presented to our youth, and to our church at large, as though He were one of the very religious zealots/nuts that had Him Crucified? IN TRUTH, the Bible presents Jesus as a Friend that sticketh closer than a brother, as the Gentle Shepherd who commanded the adults of his day not to forbid the little children to come unto Himexplaining that the Kingdom of God is comprised of such. Oh that we might present our Savior as the One Who created us to "ahh" at the beautiful flowers, and to hug the puppies and the kittens, and to feel snug and secure in our mommys hug and our daddys presence. If you can make the children in your class to understand that Jesus wants to walk with them as One who desires their friendship, both now and for the rest of their lives, then you have done the very best that you can do for them and for your Savior. Thanks for WRAPPING with us B'Ann |
|
send your Emails to |